| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? |
| Date: | 2006-06-14 17:04:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1150304658.26538.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.
Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Vincent | 2006-06-14 17:04:31 | Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-06-14 16:44:10 | Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 |