| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zydoon <fzied(at)planet(dot)tn> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: scaling up postgres |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 19:28:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1150226929.29299.54.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 16:47, Zydoon wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Thank you for sharing this.
> Coming back to my problem :) A very faithful partner accepted to
> gracefully borrow us 3 Pseries (bi-ppc + 2G RAM not more). with linux on
> them.
> Now I'm trying to make my tests, and I'm not that sure I will make the
> switch to the PSeries, since my dual xeon with 4 G RAM can handle 3500
> concurrent postmasters consuming 3.7 G of the RAM. I cannot reach this
> number on the PSeries with 2 G.
>
> can someone give me advice ?
> BTW, I promise, at the end of my tests, I'll publish my report.
Search the performance archives for the last 4 or 5 months for PPC /
pseries machines.
You'll find a very long thread about the disappointing performance the
tester got with a rather expensive P Series machine. And his happy
ending of testing on an Opteron machine.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Hamill | 2006-06-13 19:38:24 | Re: scaling up postgres |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-13 19:26:09 | Re: scaling up postgres |