Re: [PATCHES] ADD/DROP INHERITS

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ADD/DROP INHERITS
Date: 2006-06-11 17:19:37
Message-ID: 1150046377.8323.3.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-06-10 kell 13:06, kirjutas Greg Stark:

> But perhaps it's just worth those downsides to keep DROP/ADD a noop in more
> cases.

I don't think that "keeping DROP/ADD a noop in more cases." is a goal
here.

It may be a kind of semi-useful metric of design goodness, but never a
goal in itself.

--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-06-11 17:20:17 Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-11 16:32:22 longjmp in psql considered harmful

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-11 21:53:19 Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Previous Message John Gray 2006-06-10 20:10:12 Re: pgxml & xpath_table