Re: ALTER USER ..... PASSWORD ....

From: Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER USER ..... PASSWORD ....
Date: 2006-06-06 15:23:35
Message-ID: 1149607417.22835.20.camel@model.home.waw.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The point is, it hangs around: in backup 'tapes' to begin with.

And if it's the case of postmaster history, there may be lots of other
people passwords to find. (So I generaly disable postmaster
psql_history, but that's a nuicence).

But as I said, it's a sort of a nuicence, not really an issue.

Obviously, psql is not a place for any extensive command filtering. But
this touches security and I would be willing to have an exception here.

Still, that's just my 2c.

Regards,

-R

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com> writes:
> > psql clinet tool loggs issued commands into ~/.psql_history, which is
> > VERY usefull. I exercise grep-ing the file extensively.
>
> > But when it comes to command like "ALTER/CREATE USER ... PASSWORD" I'd
> > rather have it NOT logged.
>
> The history file is only readable by yourself, so I see no problem.
> Personally I *don't* want psql editorializing on what it saves there.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
-R

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Oliva 2006-06-06 16:27:33 Re: Backwards index scan
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2006-06-06 15:04:45 Re: Backwards index scan