From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alastair McKinley <a(dot)mckinley(at)analyticsengines(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Poor plan choice with partial unique indexes on jsonb column and simple RLS policy (with test script) |
Date: | 2020-03-04 00:04:40 |
Message-ID: | 11492.1583280280@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alastair McKinley <a(dot)mckinley(at)analyticsengines(dot)com> writes:
> I have recently encountered a strange poor query plan choice after implementing RLS.
> My table has a number of partial indexes on a jsonb column and the query went from low number of milliseconds to several seconds as the planner chose a different index.
> Simply stated, in the jsonb column case, "using ( (select true) )" instead of "using (true)" produces a bad plan, illustrated below:
If the planner isn't sure you have access to all rows in the table,
that disables some of its ability to estimate where-clause selectivity.
In particular it can't run "leaky" where-clauses against all values in
the table's statistics entries to see how many pass, because a nefarious
user could use that to glean info about what's in the table. Eyeing your
test query, it looks like the issue is that jsonb "->" isn't leakproof,
so that clause falls back to a default selectivity estimate, and you
get a bad plan as a result.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alastair McKinley | 2020-03-04 00:37:41 | Re: Poor plan choice with partial unique indexes on jsonb column and simple RLS policy (with test script) |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-03-03 23:19:08 | Re: Detecting which columns a query will modify in a function called by a trigger |