Re: XLogArchivingActive

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XLogArchivingActive
Date: 2006-05-26 12:03:10
Message-ID: 1148644990.7524.168.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:38 +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Editing postgresql.conf for this is ugly.

That seems to be the real issue here, not archiving. All you need to do
is to set and unset a parameter, that's all.

We're agreed that your end goal is worthwhile, but not on the mechanism
for achieving that. I don't think we should introduce complexity in one
part of the code just to get around a general issue.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-26 12:59:20 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ...
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2006-05-26 10:38:32 Re: XLogArchivingActive