| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| Date: | 2008-02-05 01:36:47 |
| Message-ID: | 11468.1202175407@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't really buy the double patching argument. Back patching becomes
> more difficult when there has been significant code drit, but we surely
> don't expect that much drift in the next week or two. Back patching when
> there has been no code drift is pretty simple.
Well, it's not hard, but it is tedious. Bruce and I, who are the people
most likely to bear the brunt of such tedium, both voted to wait a week
or so before branching. Peter did not bother to vote.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-02-05 09:00:29 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-02-05 01:28:12 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-05 01:59:25 | Re: TODO item:Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() accept localized month names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-05 01:29:17 | Re: TODO item:Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() accept localized month names |