| From: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf |
| Date: | 2006-04-23 22:37:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1145831864.2135.61.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't know :-) If it doesn't make sense for somebody, then she won't
> do it.
>
> It's not like we are going out of our way to allow somebody to revoke
> the privileges from oneself. We are just keeping the thing as simple as
> possible. As I said, maybe a reasonable option would be to raise a
> WARNING when somebody revoked the last CONNECT privilege. So you grant
> the privilege to somebody else and the revoke yours.
>
Thinking about the above... is actually a brilliant option. (always
listing to your coach they say..)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-04-23 22:39:41 | Re: Question about dependency functions in the backend |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-04-23 22:28:21 | Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf |