From: | Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 |
Date: | 2006-04-20 18:43:20 |
Message-ID: | 1145558600.29754.152.camel@archimedes |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hmmm. We use an MSA 1000 with Fibre Channel interconnects. No real
complaints, although I was a little bit disappointed by the RAID
controller's battery-backed write cache performance; tiny random writes
are only about 3 times as fast with write caching enabled as with it
disabled, I had (perhaps naively) hoped for more. Sequential scans from
our main DB (on a 5-pair RAID 10 set with 15k RPM drives) get roughly
80MB/sec.
Getting the redundant RAID controllers to fail over correctly on Linux
was a big headache and required working the tech support phone all day
until we finally got to the deep guru who knew the proper undocumented
incantations.
-- Mark Lewis
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:00 +0200, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> We're going to get one for evaluation next week (equipped with dual
> 2Gbit HBA:s and 2x14 disks, iirc). Anyone with experience from them,
> performance wise?
>
> Regards,
> Mikael
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Duddridge | 2006-04-20 19:29:46 | Recovery will take 10 hours |
Previous Message | Mikael Carneholm | 2006-04-20 18:00:03 | Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 |