Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with
Date: 2006-04-17 16:03:15
Message-ID: 1145289795.9080.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Come to think of it, someone not too long ago was proposing an API to
> allow a 'PITR slave' to subscribe to a master for WAL segments/changes;
> it seems logical to me for that API to also provide the ability to send
> relation data as well.

Is that what replication is for?

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-04-17 16:14:00 Re: A successor for PQgetssl
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-17 15:53:51 Re: A successor for PQgetssl