Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-09-17 20:32:17
Message-ID: 11452.1568752337@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-09-17 22:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But should we worry about any buildfarm members running old ccache
>> versions? It'd probably be polite to notify the owners list about
>> what the minimum ccache version is going to be.

> Buildfarm members are not running coverage, are they?

Ah, of course not. I'd forgotten the details of what we were
concerned about. Objection withdrawn.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2019-09-17 21:14:08 Re: Using postgresql.org account as an auth id on third party websites
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-09-17 20:15:02 Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org