From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Google SoC--Idea Request |
Date: | 2006-04-15 23:02:54 |
Message-ID: | 1145142174.9085.20.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 21:24 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> one to allow a message to be sent with the notify, and one to move
> from a table based design to shared mem/disk.
Doing the latter is a precondition for implementing the former in a
reasonable way, I believe.
BTW, these two web log entries summarizing Mono and Mozilla's
experiences with SoC might make interesting reading:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/summer_of_code_six_months_on.html
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Apr-13.html
> we should also look at project ideas for porting some of the most used
> third-party OSS software to PostgreSQL too (portals, CMS systems,
> accounting systems, etc.).
Given the above, I would be wary of such projects bit-rotting. If the
upstream project hasn't bothered to add PostgreSQL support, there might
be a good reason why: writing truly database-agnostic applications is
not always easy (or even desirable).
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-04-15 23:25:32 | Re: Google SoC--Idea Request |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-04-15 21:10:14 | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with |