Re: admin control over cancelling autovacuum when blocked by a lock

From: Rui DeSousa <rui(at)crazybean(dot)net>
To: MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA(at)sqlexec(dot)com>
Cc: John Lumby <johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: admin control over cancelling autovacuum when blocked by a lock
Date: 2019-04-30 15:10:12
Message-ID: 1144E125-F9BA-4202-AC01-E3FD09B147FE@crazybean.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On Apr 30, 2019, at 11:04 AM, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA(at)sqlexec(dot)com> wrote:
>
> it used to be "in the old days" that autovacuum processes acted like primary ones blocking user requests.

Hmm, haven’t seen auto vacuum block; but I believe auto vacuum freeze is still a blocking event.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Lumby 2019-04-30 20:04:02 Re: admin control over cancelling autovacuum when blocked by a lock
Previous Message MichaelDBA 2019-04-30 15:04:40 Re: admin control over cancelling autovacuum when blocked by a lock