| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql by default |
| Date: | 2006-04-11 22:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1144795436.13511.24.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:35 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> >> No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in
> >> something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?
> >
> > Using this argument I could say that we don't need primary keys, foreign
> > keys, views or rules. Especially the latter 3 ;).
>
> *slap forehead* *groan*
>
> then again, if we could pull it out and move it into loadable modules ...
> hmmmm ... >:)
Oh goodness. We could declare that we are better then MySQL because our
referential integrity is optional... oh wait...
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-11 22:53:33 | Re: plpgsql by default |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-04-11 22:35:08 | Re: plpgsql by default |