| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, lmyho <lm_yho(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
| Date: | 2006-04-07 22:27:51 |
| Message-ID: | 1144448871.32269.39.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
> > I thought from Douglas' message, it appeared BSD packages didn't need
> > such a clause...
>
> GPL partisans feel that BSD-with-advertising-clause is not compatible
> with the GPL. I think the sticking point here is that openssl is using
> an advertising clause.
But the way Douglas' message read, it was only GPL packages that should
be affected, and we're not GPL. Or did I or Douglas misunderstand the
situation?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-04-07 22:28:46 | Re: Allow linking against OpenSSL? (Was Re: Debian |
| Previous Message | Tyler MacDonald | 2006-04-07 22:24:16 | Allow linking against OpenSSL? (Was Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module) |