bad performance on Solaris 10

From: Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: bad performance on Solaris 10
Date: 2006-04-04 00:39:38
Message-ID: 1144111178.3723.80.camel@dell.home.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

I've got a somewhat puzzling performance problem here.

I'm trying to do a few tests with PostgreSQL 8.1.3 under Solaris
(an OS I'm sort of a newbie in).

The machine is a X4100 and the OS is Solaris 10 1/06 fresh install
according to manual. It's got two SAS disks in RAID 1, 4GB of RAM.

Now the problem is: this box is *much* slower than I expect.

I've got a libpg test program that happily inserts data
using PQputCopyData().

It performs an order of magnitude worse than the same thing
on a small Sun (Ultra20) running Linux. Or 4 times slower than
an iBook (sic!) running MacOS X.

So, I've this very bad feeling that there is something basic
I'm missing here.

Following are some stats:

"sync; dd; sync" show these disks write at 53 MB/s => good.

iostat 1 while my test is running says:

tty sd0 sd1 sd2 sd5
cpu
tin tout kps tps serv kps tps serv kps tps serv kps tps serv us sy
wt id
1 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1809 23 70 0
1 0 99
0 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2186 223 14 1
1 0 99
0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2488 251 13 1
1 0 98
0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2296 232 15 1
0 0 99
0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2416 166 9 1
0 0 98
0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2528 218 14 1
1 0 99
0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2272 223 15 1
0 0 99

If I interpret this correctly the disk writes at not more than 2.5
MB/sec while the Opterons do nothing => this is bad.

I've tried both, a hand compile with gcc and the solarispackages
from pgfoundry.org => same result.

Eons ago PCs had those "turbo" switches (it was never totally clear
why they put them there in the first place, anyway). I've this bad
feeling there's a secret "turbo" switch I can't spot hidden somewhere
in Solaris :/

Bye, Chris.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-04-04 00:49:27 Re: bad performance on Solaris 10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-03 21:58:02 Re: The order of fields around the "=" in the WHERE conditions