From: | "Antimon" <antimon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | PostgreSQL client api |
Date: | 2006-03-29 01:01:45 |
Message-ID: | 1143594105.124153.294320@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I was testing MySQL and PgSQL performances on my home box (amd athlon
64 3000, 1gig ddr ram, sata I hdd, win xp (x86)), select and insert
times seeemed identical with innoDB.
But when i try to query both using php, there's a huge difference even
for a funny query like "select 1"
Here's the code:
<?php
$mtime = microtime(true);
$pdo = new PDO('pgsql:host=localhost;dbname=test', "testacc", "pw");
for ($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++)
{
$result = $pdo->query("Select "+$i);
}
echo microtime(true) - $mtime;
echo "<br>";
$mtime = microtime(true);
$pdo = new PDO('mysql:host=localhost;dbname=test', "testacc", "pw");
for ($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++)
{
$result = $pdo->query("Select "+$i);
}
echo microtime(true) - $mtime;
echo "<br>";
?>
output is:
2.7696590423584
0.89393591880798
Nearly 3 times slower even w/o any table queries. But i could not
reproduce this by writing stored procs on both which selects 0-10000 in
a loop to a variable. results were almost same.
(I tried pg_ and mysqli_ functions too, results were not too different)
Is it mysql client libraries performs better? Or postgre stored procs
are 3x faster? I cannot understand, since there is not even an io
operation or any query planning stuff, what is the cause of this?
Thanks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-03-29 01:06:13 | Re: PostgreSQL client api |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-28 22:33:00 | Re: best practice in upgrading db structure |