Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?
Date: 2006-03-24 01:36:58
Message-ID: 1143164218.79972.142.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 16:41 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Now it gives a error that type double does not exist.
> >>> CREATE DOMAIN double AS float8;
> >>>
> >>> There, now the type exists ;)
> >> That's a little too perl for me ;)
> >
> > I suppose it depends on the goal. If it is an application that is to be
> > supported on more than one database, defining types and other things for
> > a given DB type (PostgreSQL) is easier than injecting a large number of
> > SWITCH statements into the code.
> \
>
> Why in the world would you build an application for anything except
> PostgreSQL?

To prove that, as unbelievable as it sounds, it is possible to do such a
thing? Don't worry, such a thing would not get into a production
environment.

--

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Miller 2006-03-24 01:47:33 Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-03-24 01:31:15 Re: Static build of psql with readline support