Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small?

From: Christian Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com, pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small?
Date: 2006-03-21 13:20:09
Message-ID: 1142947209.3709.47.camel@dell.home.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers


> No, let's start again.
>
> The user's machine ran out of resources. That can't be because inbitdb set
> max_connections too low - if anything it has probably set them too high. I
> suggested that he could possibly limit resource use by limiting the number
> of concurrent connections "make check" would use, by using the *UNRELATED*
> MAX_CONNECTIONS=n make flag. This flag is not part of buildfarm - it
> predates buildfarm in fact. It's part of the postgres build system - look in
> pg_regress.sh and the associated make file. Buildfarm has support for it as
> shown in the sample config file.

Yes,
Neither PostgreSQL nor the buildfarm code is to blame.
The problem was OpenBSD's restrictive default limit of max 64
user processes. I raised that on OpenBSD's side and as you can see
guppie turned green :)

Bye, Chris.

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-21 14:19:15 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-21 13:01:58 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-21 13:49:18 Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-21 13:01:58 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small?