Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Date: 2006-03-20 23:21:50
Message-ID: 1142896910.17883.168.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> > What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
> > three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
> > slightly more helpful for each.
>
> No particular opinion from here.
>
> Someone (was it Scott Marlowe?) recently volunteered to draft a
> complete restructuring of the admin docs --- so it would probably be
> better to think about this as part of that effort rather than a
> standalone change.

That was me, and I'm working on it right now, in the background.

If anyone has any input, I'd be glad to hear it. I'm still getting
docbooks setup on my laptop and such...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-22 13:33:28 Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-20 23:12:35 Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?