Re: PostgreSQL scalability concerns

From: Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL scalability concerns
Date: 2006-03-17 17:16:38
Message-ID: 1142615799.15418.149.camel@sigurd.incentre.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2006-16-03 at 13:51 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:14, Alen Garia - IT wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are currently planning the deployment of our next generation
> > enterprise database and we are wondering whether or not PostgreSQL could do
> > the heavy lifting that would be required. My post is a little bit long but
> > I hope it will provide you with information to allow someone to provide a
> > definitive answer.
> >
>
> The definitive answer is yes, PostgreSQL can handle this. You'll need to make
> sure you have good hardware that matches the nature of your app (oltp/olap
> and/or web/desktop). You'll probably want something that can do connection
> pooling. You can get more help on the -performance list too, just make sure
> you provide specifics. You might also want to look into getting commercial
> support, though choice questions to the mailing list might be enough to steer
> you on the right path.
Yes this also looks like a good type of implementation for Slony or the
Java clustering implementations. Both could provide fail over recovery
and load sharing capabilities.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-03-17 17:19:49 Re: Constraint Question
Previous Message jia ding 2006-03-17 16:58:12 Re: \copy combine with SELECT