From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow SELECTS after large update cycle |
Date: | 2006-03-15 23:21:27 |
Message-ID: | 1142464887.3859.195.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:39 -0500, Jan de Visser wrote:
> After fixing the hanging problems I reported here earlier (by uninstalling
> W2K3 SP1), I'm running into another weird one.
>
> After doing a +/- 8hr cycle of updates and inserts (what we call a 'batch'),
> the first 'reporting' type query on tables involved in that write cycle is
> very slow. As an example, I have a query which according to EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> takes about 1.1s taking 46s. After this one hit, everything is back to
> normal, and subsequent executions of the same query are in fact subsecond.
> Restarting the appserver and pgsql does not make the slowness re-appear, only
> running another batch will.
>
> During the 'write'/batch cycle, a large number of rows in various tables are
> inserted and subsequently (repeatedly) updated. The reporting type queries
> after that are basically searches on those tables.
>
> Anybody any ideas?
This is caused by updating the commit status hint bits on each row
touched by the SELECTs. This turns the first SELECT into a write
operation.
Try running a scan of the whole table to take the hit before you give it
back to the users.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2006-03-15 23:34:33 | Re: [HACKERS] BETWEEN optimizer problems with single-value |
Previous Message | Chris | 2006-03-15 23:11:55 | Re: Slow SELECTS after large update cycle |