mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> ... My first speculation is
> that you did your Intel numbers backwards. My second speculation is
> that you already thought of that and confirmed before posting. :-)
Yah, I checked. Several times... but if anyone else wants to repeat
the experiment, please do. Or look for bugs in either my test case
or Gurjeet's.
regards, tom lane