Re: Triggers and Multiple Schemas.

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Louis Gonzales <louis(dot)gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net>
Cc: Paul Newman <paul(dot)newman(at)tripoint(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triggers and Multiple Schemas.
Date: 2006-03-08 20:22:03
Message-ID: 1141849323.6249.9.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:19, Louis Gonzales wrote:

> >
> Paul,
> When you say "multiple identical schemas" are they all separate
> explicit schemas? Or are they all under a general 'public' schema.
> From my understanding, when you create a new db instance, it's under
> the public level schema by default unless you create an explicit
> schema and subsequently a db instance - or several - therein,
> effectively establishing sibling db instances belonging to a single
> schema, I know at least that data in the form of table access is
> allowed across the siblings. I'd also assume that this would be the
> case for triggers and functions that could be identified or defined at
> the 'root' level

Ummm. In PostgreSQL schemas are contained within databases, not the
other way around. It's cluster contains databases contains schemas
contains objects (tables, sequences, indexes, et. al.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2006-03-08 20:25:37 Re: Triggers and Multiple Schemas.
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-03-08 20:21:28 Re: Out of memory error on pg_restore