From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Louis Gonzales <louis(dot)gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net> |
Cc: | Paul Newman <paul(dot)newman(at)tripoint(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Triggers and Multiple Schemas. |
Date: | 2006-03-08 20:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 1141849323.6249.9.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:19, Louis Gonzales wrote:
> >
> Paul,
> When you say "multiple identical schemas" are they all separate
> explicit schemas? Or are they all under a general 'public' schema.
> From my understanding, when you create a new db instance, it's under
> the public level schema by default unless you create an explicit
> schema and subsequently a db instance - or several - therein,
> effectively establishing sibling db instances belonging to a single
> schema, I know at least that data in the form of table access is
> allowed across the siblings. I'd also assume that this would be the
> case for triggers and functions that could be identified or defined at
> the 'root' level
Ummm. In PostgreSQL schemas are contained within databases, not the
other way around. It's cluster contains databases contains schemas
contains objects (tables, sequences, indexes, et. al.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-03-08 20:25:37 | Re: Triggers and Multiple Schemas. |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-03-08 20:21:28 | Re: Out of memory error on pg_restore |