| From: | Ken Hill <ken(at)scottshill(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1(at)obviously(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Non Matching Records in Two Tables |
| Date: | 2006-02-15 15:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1140018341.3870.3.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:05 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Ken Hill wrote:
> >> also (hate to be obvious) have you analyzed lately?
> >>
> I'd say that's fair game, not obvious. Vacuum/Analyze is ar so aparent
> to a person moving
> to Postgres from other DB's.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
In my O'Reily "Practical PostgreSQL" book it recommends vacuuming a
production database on a daily basis. I liken this to MS Access'
"compact/repair" procedure.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Hill | 2006-02-15 16:15:46 | Modifying postgresql.org file |
| Previous Message | Ding Xiangguang | 2006-02-15 03:39:41 | view of weekly data |