| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add psql option: -1 or --single-transaction |
| Date: | 2006-02-14 15:48:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1139932130.1258.947.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 23:01 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Perhaps you can explain further? My understanding was that the desired
> > functionality was that any failure would cause all aspects of the load
> > to fail also, so I don't see any problem with that; clearly I need to
> > listen to your thoughts.
>
> Maybe we're not talking about the same thing? I was talking about the
> begin/commit statements that are already in the dump - doesn't wrapping
> the entire lot guarantee failure when you have: begin; begin; commit;
> commit; ?
Tom 'splained. I thought you meant the behaviour, rather than the
invocation.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User H-saito | 2006-02-14 15:50:14 | psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Correction of Dialog font. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-14 15:34:46 | pgsql: AllocSetStats should probably be using unsigned format to show |