Re: Confirming the autovacuum daemon is running

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Confirming the autovacuum daemon is running
Date: 2006-02-09 00:31:57
Message-ID: 1139445117l.20096l.29l@mofo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 02/08/2006 06:06:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> writes:
> > What is the proper way to confirm that the autovacuum daemon
> > is running?
>
> The autovac process doesn't run continuously, so you wouldn't
> necessarily see it in ps.

Thanks.

I suppose then if I really wanted to I could look at frozen
transaction ids or something.

Considering how important vacuuming is, it might be nice to
have an entry in the postmaster startup log or something
that confirms vacuuming is actually happening. Better yet
something that says that it is _not_ turned
on, because if it is turned on and things go bad
I presume that then they'll be an indication in the
logs. Done that way, when there are vacuum problems,
regardless of why, there'll always be something in
the log.

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2006-02-09 03:18:09 Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Previous Message James Harper 2006-02-09 00:16:14 Re: owner as namespace?