From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | andrew5(at)ece(dot)cmu(dot)edu, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
Date: | 2006-02-02 18:36:41 |
Message-ID: | 1138905401.5342.15.camel@swithin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-interfaces pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 23:48 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have researched your report, and you are right, there are two ecpg
> bugs here. First, dollar quoting uses single-quotes internally to do
> the quoting, but it does not double any single-quotes in the
> dollar-quoted string.
>
As a matter of curiosity, why does ecpg handle dollar quoting like that?
psql, for example, happily just passes a dollar quoted string through to
the backend, without any need to convert it to a conventionally quoted
string.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 14:49:33 | Re: Bug in query planer ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-02 04:48:45 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-02 19:05:03 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-02 17:48:37 | Re: Some platform-specific MemSet research |