From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "gianni(dot)zammarchi(at)tiscali(dot)it" <gianni(dot)zammarchi(at)tiscali(dot)it>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgxml |
Date: | 2006-01-25 16:15:09 |
Message-ID: | 1138205709.25819.46.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 21:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> "gianni(dot)zammarchi(at)tiscali(dot)it" <gianni(dot)zammarchi(at)tiscali(dot)it> writes:
> > I’ am looking for pgxml module for postgres 7.2.1, someone can help me
> > to find it?
>
> *Please* tell me you are not still using PG 7.2.1.
>
> There are seven subsequent releases in the 7.2 series, each containing
> fixes for very serious bugs --- see
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/release-7-2-8.html
> and following pages.
>
> Furthermore, 7.2.* has officially been abandoned as unsupported: there
> are numerous known bugs in 7.2.8 that aren't going to be fixed, ever.
>
> Rather than looking for pgxml for 7.2, you desperately need to be
> spending your time on updating to some non-stone-age version of
> Postgres.
I wonder if they're running one of those ancient windows ports of
7.2.1. I seem to remember one being done on that code branch wayyy back
in the day.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-25 16:17:42 | Re: Temporary table visibility |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-01-25 16:09:08 | Re: FW: deleted records |