| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... |
| Date: | 2005-12-21 23:12:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1135206739.3574.2.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 09:50, kirjutas Hannu Krosing:
> Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > > i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
> > > are there any plans to integrate this
> >
> > I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
> > I am).
>
> What could I do to increase your trust in it ?
>
> Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
> tests to check for it ?
>
> I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
> checking it.
It was pointed out to me that I did'nt.
So here it is:
---------------
Hannu
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vacuum.patch_against.REL_8_1_0 | text/x-patch | 18.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-21 23:14:10 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-21 22:43:38 | Re: Automatic function replanning |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-21 23:58:50 | Re: BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8 encoding conversion |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-21 19:20:38 | Re: COPY LOCK for WAL bypass |