| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Weberhofer GmbH <office(at)weberhofer(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Installation trouble - Solved |
| Date: | 2005-12-19 10:31:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1134988273.1407.12.camel@pgbuildfarm.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 09:19 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >This patch should be sent to SuSE, not PostgreSQL.
> Actually, I think this should be incoporated into a spec file
> specifically for suse within the PGDG rpms.
Well... PGDG RPM Building Project only aims to build RPMs for Red Hat
and Fedora Core. This has been so before, and personally *I* intend to
continue with the same policy.
Also, Reinhard Max is building official up2date SuSE packages.
One may state that Tom Lane is building RPMs for Fedora Core / Red Hat,
however RHEL policy does not allow users by upgrading to latest versions
via up2date; so I know that those people (including me :-) ) use the
community RPM versions to keep up with the latest version.
So, as Bruce stated, the patch (does not fit into our spec and) should
be redirected to SuSE.
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PL/php, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2005-12-19 10:44:16 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |
| Previous Message | Marian Naghen | 2005-12-19 09:57:26 | Re: sequences in transaction blocks |