From: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Mage <mage(at)mage(dot)hu>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |
Date: | 2005-12-16 17:59:48 |
Message-ID: | 1134755988.14216.64.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 18:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> writes:
> > ... So "tyty" and "tty" could be arguably both taken as double "ty",
> > except that the official form is "tty"... but from a pronunciation point
> > of view they ARE equivalent in hungarian.
>
> That's fair enough, but the question is should they be taken as
> equivalent for string-comparison purposes? (English has plenty of
> cases where different letter combinations sound alike, but we don't
> consider them equal because of that. That may not be a good analogy
> though. Also, if there are cases in other locales where strcoll
> considers non-identical strings equal, the reasoning for it might be
> quite different.)
Well, I'm not an expert on this one. In any case, hungarian has
phonetical writing as opposed to the etymological writing English has.
So in hungarian there is a 1 to 1 mapping between the sounds and the
signs used to depict them... so pronunciation is somewhat more relevant
in sorting I guess. But I'm not a linguist so I won't know for sure.
Cheers,
Csaba.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-16 18:06:58 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-16 17:54:15 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |