| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bug message not CC'ing poster |
| Date: | 2004-03-18 19:12:37 |
| Message-ID: | 11344.1079637157@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dunno, delay was never a problem with the old implementation. I think
>> Marc may have some special case in place in the mail list software
>> to allow bug-form reports to pass through. Marc?
> Actually, I'd have to open up the list completely to any postings ... the
> only thing I can really base things off of us the From address ...
I looked back and found that my recollection was wrong. The old bug
form generated this:
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
From: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Reply-To: <submitter>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
so I guess reply-to is what it'll have to be.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-18 19:14:58 | Re: postgresql.mp3 |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-18 19:04:44 | Re: postgresql.mp3 |