Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
Date: 2005-12-06 20:30:20
Message-ID: 1133901029.16256.416.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 15:21, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On the other hand, I wouldn't blame you if you thought that
> > the latest KB effort was liable to founder and die and that
> > you needed to have a back-up.
> > It wouldn't be the first one. But in that case I'd suggest
> > looking at adapting something existing (like Bricolage,
> > Framewerk, Drupal, etc.) rather than coding up from scratch.
> > If you keep your requirements simple, at least one of these
> > should suffice, and has the tremendous advantage of having
> > external code maintainence, documentation, and help.
>
> I did look at this. It was my evaluation that it would take me *more*
> work to adapt something like Drupal to my requirements, than to code
> from scratch. It's not as easy as one would like it to be to make these
> CMSes integrated into something existing. They tend to be designed to be
> the "master system" that can plug in your own custom modules in, not to
> be one of those custom modules.
>

FWIW Gevik also looked at drupal. I actually think he did really good
trying to get it to work but in the end he also concluded it wasn't
quite right.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-12-06 20:47:25 Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-06 20:26:22 Re: Integration Requirements