| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 23:32:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1133652737.2906.791.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > Understood. At 7.3, REINDEXing is essential, since rows never got
> > deleted and space was not reused. That is not the case now, hence a
> > REINDEX is less often required.
>
> But it's still required or at least desirable under some circumstances.
> If it could be improved, it would be good.
100% Agreed. I just think having an online CREATE INDEX is a much more
important thing, FWIW.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-12-04 00:40:55 | Re: [PERFORM] Network permormance under windows (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Charlie Savage | 2005-12-03 23:24:08 | Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 |