From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New.* and old.* as function arguments within rules |
Date: | 2005-12-03 17:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 1133630152l.28211l.0l@mofo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/03/2005 01:43:38 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc <kop(at)meme(dot)com> schrieb:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to make sure I understand what I'm doing.
> >
> > Where is new.* and old.* documented, as regards
> > using them as arguments to functions called from
> > rules? If it's not documented then can I rely
on the behavior?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/triggers.html
Thanks for the reply but I've obviously got some big
misunderstanding here.
1st, the docs above refer to triggers, not rules. AFIK
rules are a completely different animal.
2nd, nowhere have I found a NEW.* syntax (as written).
NEW (or OLD) seems to be a complete rowtype (or maybe
recordtype), as far as triggers go anyway, and there's
no explaination of what .* might mean in the context
of a rowtype.
Finally, the syntax seems to have something to do
with calling functions.
See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-08/msg00653.php
Which is what I found searching the archives trying to
figure out the best way to pass data in NEW and OLD
to functions called from within rules.
Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2005-12-03 17:22:58 | Re: Regular Expression Question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-03 16:43:00 | Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits |