| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, emilioplatzer(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |
| Date: | 2018-11-20 14:59:18 |
| Message-ID: | 11323.1542725958@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 11/19/18 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 06:29:55PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>>> In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/static/indexes-unique.html there are
>>> omited clausules
>> The first URL is an example and is not intended to be the complete
>> syntax.
> In fairness, the "INCLUDE" clause was added, which is new to PostgreSQL
> 11, so it could raise the question as to why aren't other clauses there.
Yes. That was a dumb idea; the correct fix is to take that out, because
it's not appropriate here. There might be room for an additional section
later in the chapter that discusses INCLUDE, but we shouldn't be
cluttering the discussion of fundamental concepts like unique indexes
with that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-11-20 15:02:01 | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-20 14:52:42 | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |