| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | William White <bwhite(at)frognet(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question about rtrees (overleft replacing left in nodes) |
| Date: | 2004-03-31 20:56:06 |
| Message-ID: | 11320.1080766566@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
William White <bwhite(at)frognet(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I can't think of an equally succinct definition of what the operators
>> really do though. Comments?
> I think "not to the left of" and "not to the right of" are sufficiently
> succinct. That they may not see much user application may not be
> relevant, if they are required to properly implement << and >> on rtrees.
Right, but what about the existing operators --- what is a more correct
way to document them?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Liu | 2004-03-31 21:13:12 | Re: select distinct w/order by |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2004-03-31 20:53:22 | Re: row-level security model |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William White | 2004-03-31 21:21:19 | Re: Question about rtrees (overleft replacing left in nodes) |
| Previous Message | William White | 2004-03-31 20:32:48 | Re: Question about rtrees (overleft replacing left in nodes) |