| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Best way to use indexes for partial match at |
| Date: | 2005-11-10 15:35:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1131636946.3554.62.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 07:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2005 10:19 schrieb Andrus:
> > thank you. I don't understand how to delete primary key index without
> > removing primary key constraint or how to force primary key to use foo_bar
> > index.
>
> You cannot drop the primary key index without dropping the primary key, and
> you cannot change the primary key to use a different index.
Ya know, this brings up an interesting question, would it be feasible to
allow for a function of somekind to be applied as an argument to a
primary key declaration? It would certainly be useful for character
type pks in non-C locales.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | juleni | 2005-11-10 15:37:36 | TIMESTAMP vs TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-10 14:37:38 | Re: Postmaster failing to start on reboot |