Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings
Date: 2002-02-01 18:35:51
Message-ID: 11300.1012588551@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I've been proposing a workable implementation in this very thread.

> Which is to track where the setting came from, right? I was thinking it
> wasn't workable because people were complaining about it. :-)

Peter's complaining because he thinks the current behavior is OK.
AFAICT he isn't saying that my idea wouldn't make the behavior be
what you and I want, but that he doesn't like that behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-01 18:57:02 Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-01 18:29:18 Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings