| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Apu Islam <apuislam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: scheduled backup |
| Date: | 2005-10-21 18:10:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1129918257.23228.10.camel@Andrea.peacock.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2005, 12:22 -0500 schrieb Apu Islam:
> I need suggestion to backup my postgresql server. The database is
> growing 1/2 Gb a day and I am looking for a solution that would push
> the data off to the backup server periodically with minimal amount of
> load to the server (I am trying to avoid table locking). I am thinking
> to use rsync to sync the data directories periodically. will that
> allow me to retrieve the data in case of a disaster ? what is the best
> practise ?
If you have big amount of data changes, continous backup of
the WAL files for point-in-time recovery is probably a good
solution. Especially if you can afford a 2nd box where the
data is continously replayed.
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/backup-online.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-10-21 18:17:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Douglas McNaught | 2005-10-21 18:02:35 | Re: scheduled backup |