From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation typos |
Date: | 2005-10-13 16:21:36 |
Message-ID: | 1129220496.8718.99.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 10:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given that a substantial fraction of our community is accustomed to
> British spellings, I've never felt that it was appropriate to try to
> standardize either way.
The same reasoning applies to the audience of (and contributors to) most
publications. AFAIK it is not considered good style to mix spelling
variants freely -- we should pick one variant and use it consistently.
(If we're going to be really precise, we could also decide to follow a
set of conventions on punctuation, capitalization, and other minor style
issues, but I can't get too excited about it.)
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-13 17:04:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos brokenness and oops question in 8.1beta2 |
Previous Message | C Wegrzyn | 2005-10-13 16:18:13 | Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |