| From: | Andrew Kelly <akelly(at)corisweb(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Limitations of PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2005-10-13 07:58:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1129190306.2468.37.camel@fedora.at.home |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:49 -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Denis G Dudhia wrote:
> >
> > > Hello There...
> > >
> > > I am new to PostgreSQL.
> > >
> > > I usually check out negative sides of any software or system, before
> > > implementing it or using it.
<snip request for pimples>
<snip pimple list>
Remarkable how exchanges like that continue to leave an impression with
me. I can't believe I'm the only one, though..
Somebody says, "Hey, can you tell me what's wrong with your product?"
And there's an answer from the product's camp: "Well, the consensus is
pretty much this...".
Simple request, honest answer.
That's the kind of currency that should be coined everywhere.
PostgreSQL has a strong and growing following because of its quality and
capability, and more power to it, I say. But there are plenty of us who
have made the choice between equal functionalities, based completely
upon the quality I've just mentioned.
Outstanding, folks.
(as well as outstanding folks)
Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Carlos Benkendorf | 2005-10-13 08:32:28 | Re: Row level locking |
| Previous Message | Stuart Bishop | 2005-10-13 07:42:26 | Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker |