From: | Andrew Kelly <akelly(at)corisweb(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Limitations of PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2005-10-13 07:58:26 |
Message-ID: | 1129190306.2468.37.camel@fedora.at.home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:49 -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Denis G Dudhia wrote:
> >
> > > Hello There...
> > >
> > > I am new to PostgreSQL.
> > >
> > > I usually check out negative sides of any software or system, before
> > > implementing it or using it.
<snip request for pimples>
<snip pimple list>
Remarkable how exchanges like that continue to leave an impression with
me. I can't believe I'm the only one, though..
Somebody says, "Hey, can you tell me what's wrong with your product?"
And there's an answer from the product's camp: "Well, the consensus is
pretty much this...".
Simple request, honest answer.
That's the kind of currency that should be coined everywhere.
PostgreSQL has a strong and growing following because of its quality and
capability, and more power to it, I say. But there are plenty of us who
have made the choice between equal functionalities, based completely
upon the quality I've just mentioned.
Outstanding, folks.
(as well as outstanding folks)
Andy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Benkendorf | 2005-10-13 08:32:28 | Re: Row level locking |
Previous Message | Stuart Bishop | 2005-10-13 07:42:26 | Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker |