From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
Date: | 2003-09-14 15:58:06 |
Message-ID: | 11289.1063555086@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I think calling it 'here-document' quoting is possibly unwise - it is
> sufficiently different from here documents in shell and perl contexts to
> make it confusing.
I agree. I've tried to think of a better alternative name, but without
much success.
> We could call it meta-quoting, or alternative quoting, maybe.
Those seem pretty unmemorable and content-free, though. Any other ideas
out there?
regards, tom lane
PS: btw, I have realized that the seemingly obvious algorithm for
choosing a delimiter string for given text is wrong. I had imagined it
as "try $$, $Q$, $QQ$, $QQQ$, etc, until you find a delimiter not
present in the given text string". This is not right because, for
example, if the string ends with $Q then $Q$ is not a usable delimiter
($Q$...$Q$Q$ would be misparsed). The simplest correct algorithm is
"try $, $Q, $QQ, $QQQ, etc until you find a string not present in the
given text string; then use that with a $ appended".
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-14 16:09:49 | sprompt.c move breaks NLS |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-14 14:12:39 | Re: massive quotes? |