Re: Vacuum and Transactions

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Date: 2005-10-05 13:07:55
Message-ID: 1128517675.1140.12.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > The vacuum ignores vacuum transaction concept looks handy right now.
>
> There is a patch for 8.1 in PATCHES list (postponed to 8.2 :( ). This
> can be backported to 8.0 quite easily.

Understood. I've seen them, but until they're well tested in the newest
version I won't be using them in a production environment.

I do appreciate the goal and look forward to this concept being applied
or a method of splitting up the work vacuum needs to do, in the future.

--

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2005-10-05 13:11:57 Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-10-05 12:38:54 Re: prefix btree implementation