| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
| Date: | 2005-10-04 11:24:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1128425094.8603.296.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:04 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:51:32PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Basically, I recommend adding "-Winline -finline-limit-1500" to the
> > > default build while we discuss other options.
> >
> > I add -Winline but get no warnings. Why would I use -finline-limit-1500?
> >
> > I'm interested, but uncertain as to what difference this makes. Surely
> > using -O3 works fine?
How did you determine the 1500 figure? Can you give some more info to
surround that recommendation to allow everybody to evaluate it?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-04 12:12:05 | Re: memory bug debugging |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-10-04 11:22:50 | Re: Tuning current tuplesort external sort code for 8.2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-04 12:24:46 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | Stefan Weiss | 2005-10-04 10:31:42 | Re: Is There Any Way .... |