From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) |
Date: | 2005-10-03 21:49:20 |
Message-ID: | 1128376160.1584.0.camel@jd.commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Too negative. We want to emphasize the positives of *our* license while not
> criticizing other people's.
PostgreSQL uses the <a> href='..'>BSD license</a>, which only requires
that the licensed source code maintain it's copyright and licensing
information. This provides for a very flexible and business friendly
licensing model.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-03 21:55:07 | Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-03 21:44:54 | Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) |