Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)
Date: 2005-10-03 21:49:20
Message-ID: 1128376160.1584.0.camel@jd.commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> Too negative. We want to emphasize the positives of *our* license while not
> criticizing other people's.

PostgreSQL uses the <a> href='..'>BSD license</a>, which only requires
that the licensed source code maintain it's copyright and licensing
information. This provides for a very flexible and business friendly
licensing model.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-03 21:55:07 Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-03 21:44:54 Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)