From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
Date: | 2005-10-02 12:57:37 |
Message-ID: | 1128257857.4823.2.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On P, 2005-10-02 at 01:24 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> writes:
>
> > I also often wish that this would be possible when someone adds a column
> > with a default value to a multi-million row table on a 24/7 production
> > system and insists on filling all existing columns with the default.
> >
> > A rule "ON SELECT FROM table_x WHERE col_x IS NULL return
> > col_x=default_for_col_x" would solve that nicely.
>
> Of course that only works if the reason they want to set fill the rows with
> the default value isn't precisely because NULL is a perfectly reasonable thing
> for the column to have (but not what they want for the existing rows).
Sure.
What would be needed for adding new colums with default filling would be
some end-of-tuple marker or stored column count or tuple version nr, and
then a rule (or just default behaviour) of showing default value for
*missing* columns (colno > nr of stored columns).
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-02 13:30:51 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-02 12:32:45 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |