Re: array_dims array_lower/upper distance

From: Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: array_dims array_lower/upper distance
Date: 2005-09-22 20:16:48
Message-ID: 1127420208.4437.13.camel@sigurd.incentre.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2005-22-09 at 12:43 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net> writes:
>
> > So to answer his question he would likely want :
> >
> > SELECT
> > array_upper(item,1) - array_upper(item,0) + 1 as elements
> > FROM
> > arraytest ;
>
> Note that this doesn't work for empty arrays.
> It will return NULL instead of 0.
Your response was not at all helpfull, I would like to
encourage you to expand on what I put off the top of my
head.

I have not used array_upper() before, and the question was
how to return the total number of elements, not how to
handle NULL and empty arrays.

One could construct a fully logic compliant routine using
CASE and IF NULL to generate the type of response you want
when checking empty or NULL arrays.

If you have something to add then provide details. If you
are just trying to seem like you know more than everyone
else then don't bother posting.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emi Lu 2005-09-22 20:40:55 Re: Questions about Rollback - after insert, update,
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-09-22 20:02:58 Re: Questions about Rollback - after insert, update,