From: | Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: array_dims array_lower/upper distance |
Date: | 2005-09-22 15:31:00 |
Message-ID: | 1127403060.4210.45.camel@sigurd.incentre.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-21-09 at 07:48 -0700, Tony Wasson wrote:
> On 9/20/05, Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> > Wondering if there's a way for postgres to return how
> > many elements are in a array as a single integer? For
> > instance, returning 10 (items in array) instead of
> > [-5:4]
> >
> > Also, is there a way to return the position of an item
> > in a array?
> >
>
> Try using array_upper and specify which array dimension.
>
> from http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/arrays.htm:
>
> "array_dims produces a text result, which is convenient for people to
> read but perhaps not so convenient for programs. Dimensions can also
> be retrieved with array_upper and array_lower, which return the upper
> and lower bound of a specified array dimension, respectively."
>
>
> pg8=# SELECT array_dims('{4,2,3,5,6}'::INT[]);
> array_dims
> ------------
> [1:5]
> (1 row)
>
> pg8=# SELECT array_upper('{4,2,3,5,6}'::INT[],1);
> array_upper
> -------------
> 5
>
So to answer his question he would likely want :
SELECT
array_upper(item,1) - array_upper(item,0) + 1 as elements
FROM
arraytest ;
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-22 15:31:47 | Re: wrong protocol sequence? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-22 15:26:55 | Re: ORDER BY results |